Sunday, May 5, 2019

Ethics Case Study Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Ethics topic Study - Essay ExampleJerrys training inwardly the medical field surrounds him to non be in a position from where he potentiometer prescribe anyone a medicine. This kick ins him disqualified to resolve an final payment at hand, which in this case has happened when Dr. Williams was not present on his seat. there is a possibility that Dr. Williams has basically forbidden dosage of Valium to a certain patient, and in this case if Jerry McCall prescribes usage of Valium good on the basis of being Dr. Williams friend, then this shall become an ethical issue all the same. Hence it would be allowance enough for Jerry McCall to keep himself at a distance from making that wrong move by prescribing medicine to this patient which basically transgresses his authority by quite a fair proportion. 2 Would it make a difference if the medication requested were for control of high blood pressure that the patient critically needs on a daily basis? Why or why not? champion should believe that it would not be any different if the requested medication controls high blood pressure. thither would be no difference if the discussion centered on lowering it all the same. The reason for this is that the harming of medication required to be devoted by Jerry McCall or any other person in charge is uncalled for. He should seek the advice of Dr. Williams and since he is not present on his seat, it would be a intelligent decision to stay put and ask Dr. Williams friend to wait for a certain while. Dr. Williams alone would be the best person to suggest which medicine and how much dosage would be deemed as a fitting one for his friend under such a circumstance. The patient essential know that Dr. Williams only can help him and no one else from his staff has the right or the authority to issue a replenish order. 3 If Jerry calls in the refill and the patient has an adverse reaction while flying, is Jerry protected from a causal agency under the doctrine of respondent superior? It is safe to suggest that Jerry McCall would not gain any aegis from a courting. This is because under the basis of the doctrine of respondent superior, if the patient feels that he has had an adverse reaction steady though he is flying there are serious legal issues which will come to the fore. There would be serious charges for Jerry McCall as he will be the one who brought about the medication realms towards the patient. fundamentally speaking, it will also make Dr. Williams duty bound and thus he would also have to bear up under the lawsuit as Jerry is his employee. Since the medication was never appreciated in the first place and was totally uncalled for, the consumption that Jerry plays under such a situation becomes even more significant. The reason for this is that he was never given the permission to provide for medication to patients as he does not qualify for any post within Dr. Williams office. One must not forget that he is an office assistant, and thus his occupancy domains do not allow him to administer issuing a refill order for patients as and when required by the patients. Hence, the lawsuit would come about on Jerry McCall as well as Dr. Williams for being negligent towards their duties and for being unethical within their working basis (Weber, 2000). 4 What is your advice to Jerry? If someone could give an advice to Jerry, it would be that he should perform his job alone and not think about doing something which can be regarded as an immoral act. He must not interfere within the working basis of his employer Dr. Williams. If he does so, he will be sufficient to maintain

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.